Multiple Intelligences v. Learning Styles

The Paladins are on the side of multiple intelligences. We have decided that multiple intelligence is the preferred theory over learning styles. One major flaw we saw with learning styles was the categorization of a person into one type of learning style. Although a person may have a preference in a learning style it does not limit them to learning only in that preferred style.  Evidence has shown that students absorb information just as well whether or not they encounter it in their categorized learning style. We also found that many of the sources pointed towards learning styles being a discredited theory.  A group distinguished psychologists, Pashler, McDaniel, Rohrer and Bjork, in a 2008 review concluded that the scientific research on learning styles is “so week and unconvincing” that it is not possible “to justify incorporating learning-styles assessments into general educational practices.”Our conclusion of finding a lack of sources that support the learning styles theory is that the use learning styles does not increase learn potentials or outcomes.

The multiple intelligences theory allows learners to experience a range of cognitive abilities, not limiting a person to one area. Students are able to identify strengths and weakness within the intelligences. The multiple intelligences theory allows for engaging instruction through differentiation to appeal to students through the use of multiple cognitive faculties.  A multitude of research has shown that the use of engagement strategies benefits students and helps build characteristics of a 21st century learner.  Students are able to experience learning through authentic tasks and  meaningful experiences. Overall, the multiple intelligences theory has more support in benefiting the learning of students.

Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning Styles Concepts and Evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest,9(3), 105-119. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038